THE OBSERVATION
Companies rarely wake up one morning and discover that procurement is broken.
It happens gradually. The business grows. New locations open. Acquisitions bring their own suppliers and habits. More people gain buying authority. Contracts live in different places. Spend gets harder to see. What worked when the company was smaller starts to strain under the weight of growth.
Eventually someone says, “We need better procurement.” Fair enough. But better than what, and better for what?
That question matters. I have seen companies jump straight to software, policies, headcount, or a big sourcing initiative before anyone has defined what a good procurement capability should actually look like for the business. That is a little like buying a treadmill and assuming fitness will follow. Sometimes you just end up with an expensive place to hang clothes.
WHAT IT TELLS YOU
Procurement maturity is not about having the most process. It is about having the right capability for the size, complexity, risk, and growth of the business.
A growing company does not need to imitate a Fortune 100 procurement organization. It does need enough visibility, ownership, governance, supplier discipline, and commercial capability to keep growth from creating unnecessary cost and risk.
Good should be specific. Who owns major categories? Who is authorized to buy what—and at what level? Which supplier relationships require enterprise oversight? How are contracts managed? How are acquisitions integrated? What information does leadership need to make decisions?
If those answers are unclear, adding more process will not fix the problem. It may simply make the confusion more official.
WHAT TO LOOK FOR
Before designing the future state, look for the places where growth has outpaced the operating model:
• Are important categories owned, or simply purchased by whoever needs them?
• Are multiple parts of the company buying from the same suppliers under different terms?
• Do people know when procurement should be involved and what authority it has?
• Are contracts, supplier performance, and major commitments visible at the enterprise level?
• Could a new acquisition plug into the current model without creating another parallel way of buying?
The goal is not to find fault. It is to understand where the current model has reached its limits and where additional capability would actually help.
WHAT TO DO NEXT
Define good in plain English before you start building it.
Describe what procurement should make easier for the business. Clarify decision rights, category ownership, supplier governance, contracting, and spend visibility. Separate what is needed now from what can wait.
Build the minimum capability that solves the real problem. Keep routine purchases routine; give strategic suppliers and high-risk decisions more structure. Do not build an aircraft carrier when the business only needs to cross a pond.
Design something people can actually use. If the operating model only makes sense to the people who built the PowerPoint, it is not an operating model yet.
The best procurement capabilities become part of how the company operates: people know when to engage, who owns what, and how decisions get made.
THE STRATTON VIEW
You cannot build toward better until you define what good means for your business.
Maturity is not more process. It is the right capability at the right time.
Discipline. Partnership. Enduring Value.
STRATTON & Co. | Procurement leadership for growing companies
Leave a Reply